| Motor de Búsqueda de Datasheet de Componentes Electrónicos |
|
AD9546/PCBZ Datasheet(PDF) 126 Page - Analog Devices |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AD9546/PCBZ Datasheet(HTML) 126 Page - Analog Devices |
|
126 / 205 page ![]() AD9546 Data Sheet Rev. 0 | Page 126 of 205 Table 80. Maximum DPLL Loop Filter Bandwidth NCO Gain Filter Bandwidth Selection LF0 Maximum Loop Bandwidth (Hz) LF1 Maximum Loop Bandwidth (Hz) 0 1850 305 1 925 152.5 2 462.5 76.3 3 231.3 38.1 4 115.6 19.1 5 57.81 9.53 6 28.91 4.77 7 14.45 2.38 8 7.227 1.191 9 3.613 0.596 10 1.807 0.298 11 0.9033 0.149 12 0.4517 0.745 13 0.2258 0.037 14 0.1219 0.019 15 0.0565 0.009 DPLL NCO The DPLL NCO requires an external clock source. In the case of the AD9546, the external clock source drives the XOA and XOB input pins, from which an integrated PLL synthesizer generates a clock signal that is approximately 2.4 GHz. The DPLL normally operates in closed-loop fashion (that is, as a PLL), which is the normal operating mode, wherein the loop filter is the FTW source for the NCO. However, under certain conditions, the DPLL operates in an open-loop configuration. Figure 91 differentiates between the two configurations by means of a switch. A loop controller determines whether the DPLL is in closed-loop operation (switch closed) or open-loop operation (switch open), while an FTW processor determines the FTW source for the NCO. DIGITAL PHASE DETECTOR DIGITAL LOOP FILTER SYSTEM CLOCK NUMERIC COEFFICIENTS NCO LOCK DETECTORS FTW PROCESSOR 46 LOOP CONTROLLER XOA XOB AD9546 TDC TDC 48-BIT FTW FREERUN TUNING WORD DIGITAL CROSS POINT MUX NOTES 1. A RANGE OF BITS USES A COLON SEPARATOR 2. REGISTER ADDRESSES ARE SPECIFIC TO DPLL0 N DIVIDER REG 0x1005 TO 0x1000, BITS[45:0] Figure 91. DPLL Block Diagram Figure 91 also shows the lock detectors (see the DPLL Lock Detectors section). For details on the feedback divider, see the DPLL Feedback Divider (N Divider) section. For clarity, Figure 91 also shows the digital cross point mux and TDCs that feed the digital phase detector. The TDCs convert the rising edges of the input and feedback signals to numeric time stamps (see the Time to Digital Converter (TDC) section for details). Although Figure 91 shows the N divider connected directly to the NCO output, this diagram is a simplification of the actual feedback path (see Figure 82 in the Frequency Translation Loops section). However, regarding the operation and control of the DPLL, this simplification is valid in the context of the following paragraphs. Frequency tuning of the DPLL is by virtue of an NCO, which employs a sigma-delta modulator (SDM) architecture. The SDM has an internal integer divider that divides down the system clock frequency with the output of the divider constituting the output of the NCO. The SDM effectively modulates the modulus of this divider to produce an output frequency that is a fractionally scaled down version of the system clock frequency based on an input 48-bit FTW. Because the NCO is SDM-based, it employs noise shaping that redistributes its modulation noise away from the NCO output frequency (the APLL, which follows the DPLL, suppresses the out of band modulation noise of the SDM). The output frequency of the NCO (fNCO) depends primarily on the numeric value of the 48-bit FTW and the frequency of the system clock (fS) per the following equation: fNCO = fS × FTW/248 For a given fS and a desired fNCO, compute FTW as FTW = round(248 × fNCO/fS) (18) where round(x) is a function to round x to the nearest integer. The NCO automatically converts the 48-bit FTW into two components: an integer part (INT) and a fractional part (FRAC). INT and FRAC relate to FTW as INT = floor(248/FTW) (19) FRAC = 2−40 × round(240 × ((248/FTW) − INT)) (20) where: 7 ≤ INT ≤ 13. 0.05 ≤ FRAC ≤ 0.95. floor(x) is a function that leaves x unchanged if x is an integer. Otherwise, x becomes the nearest integer in the negative direction. The constraints on INT and FRAC necessarily impose limitations on the choice of FTW. For example, let fS = 2.30 GHz and fNCO = 245.76 MHz, which yields (per Equation 18). FTW = 30,076,213,163,657 Then, per Equation 19 and Equation 20, INT = 9 FRAC = 0.35872395833303016843274235725403 In this case, INT and FRAC satisfy their defined constraints. Although the preceding example validates FTW for the given fS and fNCO, the example does not necessarily validate FTW for a |
|
Enlace URL |
| ¿ALLDATASHEET es útil para Ud.? [ DONATE ] |
Todo acerca de Alldatasheet | Publicidad | Contáctenos | Política de Privacidad | Enlace a la hoja de datos | Intercambio de Enlaces | Lista de Fabricantes All Rights Reserved©Alldatasheet.com |
| Russian : Alldatasheetru.com | Korean : Alldatasheet.co.kr | Spanish : Alldatasheet.es | French : Alldatasheet.fr | Italian : Alldatasheetit.com Portuguese : Alldatasheetpt.com | Polish : Alldatasheet.pl | Vietnamese : Alldatasheet.vn Indian : Alldatasheet.in | Mexican : Alldatasheet.com.mx | British : Alldatasheet.co.uk | New Zealand : Alldatasheet.co.nz |
|
Family Site : ic2ic.com |
icmetro.com |